Whenever the question of the greatest movie trilogy ever made is posed, a lot of usual suspects are bound to come up: Peter Jackson’sLord of the Ringstrilogy, theToy Storytrilogy, Richard Linklater’sBeforetrilogy.The Lord of the Ringstrilogy was a landmark technical achievement that adapted the unadaptable; theToy Storytrilogy tells three perfectly structured stories building up to an organic, definitive, heartstring-tugging conclusion (although it’s now marred by an unnecessary fourth installment); and theBeforetrilogy is one of the most powerful and emotionally engaging love stories ever told.

They’re all great trilogies – as are theBourne,Evil Dead, andBack to the Futuretrilogies – but there’s one that tops them all. None of these trilogies have redefined a genre, captured the essence of cinema, and stood the test of time quite like Sergio Leone’sDollarstrilogy.

Clint Eastwood looking through a noose in A Fistful of Dollars

RELATED:What Separates Spaghetti Westerns From Regular Westerns?

A lot of trilogies stumble on the third film, like the originalStar Warstrilogy with the Ewoks and second Death Star inReturn of the Jedior Sam Raimi’sSpider-Mantrilogy with the emo behavior and multitude of villains inSpider-Man 3.The GodfatherandThe Godfather Part IIcould’ve been the greatest two-part movie ever made, butthe unwelcome addition ofThe Godfather Part IIIhas instead made Francis Ford Coppola’s masterpiece a subpar trilogy. Sometimes, trilogies suffer from one weak link, likeIndiana Jones and the Temple of Doom.

Producing a perfect film trilogy is a lot trickier than it sounds. Making one great movie is a near-impossible feat; making three great movies, each one greater than the last, requires the assistance of divine intervention. TheDollarstrilogy is perhaps the only movie trilogy with a great first movie, an even greater second movie, and an even greater third movie. And it doesn’t hurt that Ennio Morricone’s groundbreaking, operatic western music – just as recognizable as any of the themes composed by John Williams or Danny Elfman – permeates throughout each film.

Lee Van Cleef holding a rifle in For a Few Dollars More

TheDollarstrilogy revolves aroundClint Eastwood’s “Man with No Name” character– also known as “Joe,” “Manco,” and “Blondie” – a cool-as-ice bounty hunter who wanders the dusty landscapes of the Old West in search of injustice. The trilogy kicked off with 1964’sA Fistful of Dollars, one of the most influential movies ever made. Through the lens of reimagining Akira Kurosawa’sYojimbo(so closely that it’s almost a shot-for-shot remake in some places), Leone usedFistfulto define the spaghetti western. He’d grown up on John Ford’s classic westerns, enjoying the breathtaking cinematography and well-crafted action scenes but lamenting the black-and-white morals and tame violence. With its remorseless revisionist take on western iconography,A Fistful of Dollarslaunchedan entire subgenre of blood-soaked Italian westerns.

It was such a cultural landmark that following it up with a sequel would’ve been considered a fool’s errand. But the Man with No Name returned in 1965’sFor a Few Dollars More, in which he teamed up with a fellow sharpshooting antihero, played by a mesmerizing Lee Van Cleef, to bring in a heavily guarded bounty that neither of them could handle alone. This escalated the conflict fromFistfuland told a brand-new story whileremaining true to Eastwood’s characterand Leone’s brutal vision of the West.

Clint Eastwood wearing a poncho in The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

The third movie is often where a franchise drops the ball:Jaws 3-D,Superman III,Alien 3,Rambo III,Scream 3,Blade: Trinity,Batman Forever,X-Men: The Last Stand,Terminator 3: Rise of the Machines,Halloween III: Season of the Witch– the list goes on and on and on. In the case of theDollarstrilogy, the third movie is by far the greatest.

After collaborating on two bona fide masterpieces, Eastwood and Leone managed to top their own achievements withThe Good, the Bad, and the Ugly. The 1966 threequel isn’t just the bestDollarsmovie;it might be the greatest western ever made. Leone uses another deceptively simplistic premise – this time, Blondie (“the good”) races two other guys (“the bad” and “the ugly”) to a cache of Confederate gold buried in a cemetery – to tell a quintessential adventure story on the frontier; a three-hour everything-but-the-kitchen-sink western epic.

The titular trio in a climactic standoff in The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

All three movies in theBeforetrilogy are perfect, even bringing the story of Jesse and Céline to an end with just the right mix of closure and ambiguity inBefore Midnight, but its dialogue-driven narratives would work just as well as a stage play. TheDollarstrilogy, on the other hand, is pure cinema – and Leone’s command of cinematic techniques is unparalleled. The plot and character beats in theDollarstrilogy are conveyed entirely through sound and visuals, using recurring motifs like a music box that signifies Lee Van Cleef’s motivation for revenge. The climactic shootout inThe Good, the Bad, and the Uglyhas some of the sharpest editing in movie history, cutting between tighter and tighter closeups of the titular trio before they finally draw their pistols and fire.

UnlikeStar WarsandThe Lord of the Rings, theDollarstrilogy doesn’t tell an ongoing, serialized story. In this sense, it’s a lot more like another common pick for the greatest film trilogy of all time: Christopher Nolan’sDark Knighttrilogy. Both theDollarsandDark Knighttrilogies consist of three separate character studies of an antiherolinked together by a recurring cast. But the crucial difference with theDollarstrilogy is that the third chapter has the grandiosity and finality to feel like the conclusion of an ongoing narrative.

Clint Eastwood looking up at a noose in A Fistful of Dollars

The finale is where Nolan’s trilogy didn’t manage to stick the landing.Batman Beginsoffered a refreshingly gritty portrait of the Bat and a more in-depth telling of his origin story than ever before.The Dark Knightfollowed it up with a standalone neo-noir that pits Bats against his arch-nemesis and holds up asarguably the ultimate Batman movie. Unfortunately, that became the trilogy’s downfall.The Dark Knight Risescouldn’t topThe Dark Knight. Tom Hardy gives a delightfully eccentric performance as Bane, but it pales in comparison to the iconic sadism of Heath Ledger’s Oscar-winning Joker. In trying to topThe Dark Knight, Nolan went too big and ended up staging the French Revolution on the streets of Gotham while Bruce Wayne was confined to a hole in the ground with a broken back for the majority of the runtime.

The shortcomings of overambitious finales likeThe Dark Knight Rises,Spider-Man 3, andThe Matrix Revolutionsmake the craft, vibrancy, and timelessness ofThe Good, the Bad, and the Uglyall the more impressive. And what’s even more impressive is that Leone made these movies a year apart. The makers of theStar Warssequel trilogy had twice as long andcouldn’t even come up with a coherent storyline.

MORE:This Brutal Spaghetti Western Is A Must-See For Fans Of Red Dead Redemption 2